Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Krishna defeats Shiva in battle ...
Gaudiya Repercussions > How We Relate to Spirit > Eastern Traditions
Nitaibhangra
Yes , here we have it all , the Star wars ( vedic version ), mixed with the release of the atomic bomb ( the final day ... )

But the best thing is , of course , that Krishna emerges victorious from that battle ...

Please enjoy also the prayers of the poor humiliated Shiva , when he lowers his head before Krishna and admits his insignificance before him ...

[
QUOTE
SB 10.63.6: Lord Rudra, accompanied by his son Kartikeya and the Pramathas, came riding on Nandi, his bull carrier, to fight Balarama and Krishna on Bana's behalf.

SB 10.63.7: A most astonishing, tumultuous and hair-raising battle then commenced, with Lord Krishna matched against Lord Sankara, and Pradyumna against Kartikeya.

SB 10.63.10-11: With sharp-pointed arrows discharged from His bow Sarnga, Lord Krishna drove away the various followers of Lord Siva -- Bhutas, Pramathas, Guhyakas, Dakinis, Yatudhanas, Vetalas, Vinayakas, Pretas, Matas, Pisacas, Kushmandas and Brahma-rakshasas.

SB 10.63.12: Lord Siva, wielder of the trident, shot various weapons at Lord Krishna, wielder of Sarnga. But Lord Krishna was not in the least perplexed: He neutralized all these weapons with appropriate counterweapons.

SB 10.63.13: Lord Krishna counteracted a brahmastra with another brahmastra, a wind weapon with a mountain weapon, a fire weapon with a rain weapon, and Lord Siva's personal pasupatastra weapon with His own personal weapon, the narayanastra.

SB 10.63.14: After bewildering Lord Siva by making him yawn with a yawning weapon, Lord Krishna proceeded to strike down Banasura's army with His sword, club and arrows.o

SB 10.63.22: After Lord Siva's followers had been driven away, the Siva-jvara, who had three heads and three feet, pressed forward to attack Lord Krishna. As the Siva-jvara approached, he seemed to burn everything in the ten directions.

SB 10.63.23: Seeing this personified weapon approach, Lord Narayana then released His own personified fever weapon, the Vishnu-jvara. The Siva-jvara and Vishnu-jvara thus battled each other.

SB 10.63.24: The Siva-jvara, overwhelmed by the strength of the Vishnu-jvara, cried out in pain. But finding no refuge, the frightened Siva-jvara approached Lord Krishna, the master of the senses, hoping to attain His shelter. Thus with joined palms he began to praise the Lord.

SB 10.63.25: The Siva-jvara said: I bow down to You of unlimited potencies, the Supreme Lord, the Supersoul of all beings. You possess pure and complete consciousness and are the cause of cosmic creation, maintenance and dissolution. Perfectly peaceful, You are the Absolute Truth to whom the Vedas indirectly refer.

SB 10.63.26: Time; fate; karma; the jiva and his propensities; the subtle material elements; the material body; the life air; false ego; the various senses; and the totality of these as reflected in the living being's subtle body -- all this constitutes your material illusory energy, maya, an endless cycle like that of seed and plant. I take shelter of You, the negation of this maya.

SB 10.63.27: With various intentions, You perform pastimes to maintain the demigods, the saintly persons and the codes of religion for this world. By these pastimes You also kill those who stray from the right path and live by violence. Indeed, your present incarnation is meant to relieve the earth's burden.

SB 10.63.28: I am tortured by the fierce power of Your terrible fever weapon, which is cold yet burning. All embodied souls must suffer as long as they remain bound to material ambitions and thus averse to serving Your feet.

SB 10.63.29: The Supreme Lord said: O three-headed one, I am pleased with you. May your fear of My fever weapon be dispelled, and may whoever remembers our conversation here have no reason to fear you.

SB 10.63.30: Thus addressed, the Mahesvara-jvara bowed down to the infallible Lord and went away. But Banasura then appeared, riding forth on his chariot to fight Lord Krishna.

SB 10.63.33: Lord Siva felt compassion for his devotee Banasura, whose arms were being cut off, and thus he approached Lord Cakrayudha [Krishna] and spoke to Him as follows.

SB 10.63.34: Sri Rudra said: You alone are the Absolute Truth, the supreme light, the mystery hidden within the verbal manifestation of the Absolute. Those whose hearts are spotless can see You, for You are uncontaminated, like the sky.

SB 10.63.35-36: The sky is Your navel, fire Your face, water Your semen, and heaven Your head. The cardinal directions are Your sense of hearing, herbal plants the hairs on Your body, and water-bearing clouds the hair on Your head. The earth is Your foot, the moon Your mind, and the sun Your vision, while I am Your ego. The ocean is Your abdomen, Indra Your arm, Lord Brahma Your intelligence, the progenitor of mankind Your genitals, and religion Your heart. You are indeed the original purusha, creator of the worlds.

SB 10.63.37: Your current descent into the material realm, O Lord of unrestricted power, is meant for upholding the principles of justice and benefiting the entire universe. We demigods, each depending on Your grace and authority, develop the seven planetary systems.

SB 10.63.38: You are the original person, one without a second, transcendental and self-manifesting. Uncaused, you are the cause of all, and You are the ultimate controller. You are nonetheless perceived in terms of the transformations of matter effected by Your illusory energy -- transformations You sanction so that the various material qualities can fully manifest.

SB 10.63.39: O almighty one, just as the sun, though hidden by a cloud, illuminates the cloud and all other visible forms as well, so You, although hidden by the material qualities, remain self-luminous and thus reveal all those qualities, along with the living entities who possess them.

SB 10.63.40: Their intelligence bewildered by Your maya, fully attached to children, wife, home and so on, persons immersed in the ocean of material misery sometimes rise to the surface and sometimes sink down.

SB 10.63.41: One who has attained this human form of life as a gift from God, yet who fails to control his senses and honor Your feet, is surely to be pitied, for he is only cheating himself.

SB 10.63.42: That mortal who rejects You -- his true Self, dearmost friend, and Lord -- for the sake of sense objects, whose nature is just the opposite, refuses nectar and instead consumes poison.

SB 10.63.43: I, Lord Brahma, the other demigods and the pure-minded sages have all surrendered wholeheartedly unto You, our dearmost Self and Lord.

SB 10.63.44: Let us worship You, the Supreme Lord, to be freed from material life. You are the maintainer of the universe and the cause of its creation and demise. Equipoised and perfectly at peace, You are the true friend, Self and worshipable Lord. You are one without a second, the shelter of all the worlds and all souls.

SB 10.63.45: This Banasura is my dear and faithful follower, and I have awarded him freedom from fear. Therefore, my Lord, please grant him Your mercy, just as You showed mercy to Prahlada, the lord of the demons.

SB 10.63.46: The Supreme Lord said: My dear lord, for your pleasure We must certainly do what you have requested of Us. I fully agree with your conclusion.

SB 10.63.47: I will not kill this demonic son of Vairocani, for I gave Prahlada Maharaja the benediction that I would not kill any of his descendants.

SB 10.63.51: At the front of the party Lord Krishna then placed Aniruddha and His bride, both beautifully adorned with fine clothes and ornaments, and surrounded them with a full military division. Thus Lord Krishna took His leave of Lord Siva and departed.

SB 10.63.52: The Lord then entered His capital. The city was lavishly decorated with flags and victory arches, and its avenues and crossways were all sprinkled with water. As conchshells, anakas and dundubhi drums resounded, the Lord's relatives, the brahmanas and the general populace all came forward to greet Him respectfully.

SB 10.63.53: Whoever rises early in the morning and remembers Lord Krishna's victory in His battle with Lord Siva will never experience defeat .
madhavadasa
Great! Violence and wisdom combined in a story. biggrin.gif
Chanahari
Hmmm. Did your faith in Krishna just restored, Nitaicandra? ohmy.gif
I see you collecting shastric support for Krishna's superiority (over Shiva).
Adrija
Dear Nitaichandra:
Are you aware of the historical rivalry between Vaishnavism and Shaivism ?

Are you also aware of the humiliation that Vishnu feels before Shiva, and how He admits His defeat and insignificance in Shaivic literature ?

Are you also aware that certain members of this forum, and their families, are practising Shaivas, and could just as easily post similair 'stories' that would offend Vaishnava sensibilities, but refrain from doing so out of respect for others ?

Or do you just not give a damn ?
evakurvan
I like these stories they are charming. Do you think they are meant to show objective superiority of one deity over another in the ultimate sense?

I know it is an offense that removes the potency of your chanting if you consider the power of Krishna in any way even comparable to the power of another deity...
I wonder how that offense is really meant or is it meant just as it is written.
I have problems believing that this is what you are supposed to believe at every level, or maybe just on an emotional devotional level.
Nitaibhangra
QUOTE (Chanahari @ Oct 1 2005, 10:53 PM)
Hmmm. Did your faith in Krishna just restored, Nitaicandra? ohmy.gif
I see you collecting shastric support for Krishna's superiority (over Shiva).
*


Ok , I will now tell what was the purpose of creating this thread , and similar others :

Some days ago , another member responded in a very condescending way to a post of mine that was really quite neutral , and quite interfaith-oriented .
When I read his response , I couldn´t believe my eyes :
This living entity treated me like an inexperienced child that should not endulge in reading and quoting shastra without having some previous qualifications and without having accomplished some deeds ...
And actually , I like shastra ...

So this living entity wanted to forbid me to ever again research about the relationship between Shiva and Vishnu ...

So , I just stopped the conversation , but I decided to create topics showing the superiority of Vishnu over Shiva , just for the sake of it ( even though I don´t care about this controversy , having lost my faith in vaishnavism )...
Because I don´t like that somebody will come over and tell me what I should do or not do .

Yes , I have lost my faith in vaishnavism , but I have very fond memories of it . The best moments in my life have been experienced when I was a staunch believer and when I was practicing .

PS : I might have lost my faith , but some inner voice keeps telling me that I might be wrong in my conclusions , and that I should see things as I did before .
That´s why I post things like these with great delight .
And also because of the selfish desire of getting the results ( punya ? phala ? ):
QUOTE
SB 10.63.53: Whoever rises early in the morning and remembers Lord Krishna's victory in His battle with Lord Siva will never experience defeat

Well , I don´t rise early in the morning , but maybe Krishna ( if he exists and if he is benevolent and not a tyrranic autocrat ) still gives me some rewards for glorifying him shastrically in the wideness of cyberspace ...
angrezi
No. We're all in maya so this is insignificant katha. biggrin.gif .... The rivalry between the gods is at least 1500 years old. It's kind of cute people, mostly westerners, still get into it smile.gif

The combo deities, Hari-Hara, Surya-Narayana etc. are from a specific time in history (5-1000AD), God is one so why even worry about it... laugh.gif laugh.gif laugh.gif laugh.gif laugh.gif
Nitaibhangra
QUOTE (Adrija @ Oct 1 2005, 10:57 PM)
Dear Nitaichandra:
                        Are you aware of the historical rivalry between Vaishnavism and Shaivism ?
*


Yes I am .

QUOTE
Are you also aware of the humiliation that Vishnu feels before Shiva, and how He admits His defeat and insignificance in Shaivic literature ?


I have heard several times that in the Puranas centered on Shiva-worship , the result of the battles is exactly the opposite , with Shiva defeating Vishnu .

QUOTE
... and could just as easily post similair 'stories' that would offend Vaishnava sensibilities ...


I would find this very interesting and refreshing to the mind , not having faith anymore in vaishnavism .

QUOTE
Or do you just not give a damn ?


Nice to meet persons so well-mannered like you , who can express themselves in a pleasing way , using very decent vocabulary .


PS: Most of all , this is a forum for former vaishnavas , and I don´t want to hide some aspects of my former faith :
Vaishnavism will not spare any other rivalling school of thought or tradition of the corresponding criticisms (~~~ kaitava-dharma , mleccha-dharma , kutaka-nyaya ... ) .
Since this is a forum for former gaudiyas , why should this elitist tendency of vaishnavism be hidden ?
In a purely interfaith-forum one would be more careful about posting stories like the titular one , but in this vaishnava-forum ?
Chanahari
QUOTE (Nitaicandra @ Oct 2 2005, 12:31 AM)
Some days ago , another member responded in a very condescending way to a post of mine that was really quite neutral , and quite interfaith-oriented .
When I read his response , I couldn´t believe my eyes :
This living entity treated me like an inexperienced child that should not endulge in reading and quoting shastra without having some previous qualifications and without having accomplished some deeds ...
And actually , I like shastra ...

So this living entity wanted to forbid me to ever again research about the relationship between Shiva and Vishnu ...

So , I just stopped the conversation , but I decided to create topics showing the superiority of Vishnu over Shiva , just for the sake of it  ( even though I don´t care about this controversy , having lost my faith in vaishnavism )...

*


I understand now.

The only thing I'd like to ask from you to please mind the sensibilities of our other Shaivas - one of you gave an unpleasant reply to you, but this is not a good reason to provoke all the others who worship Shiva here. For those who don't know you at all, you sound like a Vaishnava fanatic wo tries to establish his own superiority through establishing his deity's superiority.
Milla
QUOTE
QUOTE
... and could just as easily post similair 'stories' that would offend Vaishnava sensibilities ...



I would find this very interesting and refreshing to the mind , not having faith anymore in vaishnavism .


I agree with Nitaicandra; it would be refreshing and informative and would help to see Vaishnavism in perspective.

I would also like to ask Adrija what prompted this "shift of awareness" as Aran called it (if you don't mind my asking). Usually the former ISKCON devotees who are "into it" take the route Gaudiya Math/ raganuga-bhakti or Shri Vaishnavism/ theology or indology, or Gaudiya Math/ New Age or Christianity, or any other combination of these seven.
Adrija
Chanahari - am I the person you are referring to who was unpleasant ? - I certainly didn't intend to be.

Milla FLOWERS.GIF - I don't think of Shiva as a god, or even God in the way most western people understand that word, or even as Vaishnavas do.
I can't really speak for Aran - though I could ask him (?)
For me, it's been long and complicated - I also took the Gaudiya Math (Chaitanya Saraswata) way, and was a disciple of Sridhara Maharaja too from '82 - '95, but became a bit weary of the Vaishnava path around '89 or so - I just began to feel out of place, like I had taken a wrong turning somewhere ( I don't know if this is making any sense, and it may sound too simplistic). What happened after that, is, as are all matters of faith, very personal, and doesn't really concern anyone except those who share that faith with me - to everyone else it is just another story- you know how it is ?
As I stated in my biog, aspects of Vaisnava philosophy which appealed to me upon first discovering Iskcon, at the age of 15, were increasingly troubling to me in later life (for instance the dogmatism of the Gaudiya doctrine, the sexual puritanism, the elitism etc.)
I wouldn't see the point of posting Puranic stories on line - in Shaivism they are taken as symbolic, and also, in some branches, require participation, which means that every story would have to be posted with instructions and a purport !
It's amazing how ignorant most G.V's are of other Indian Traditions, Shaivism, Shaktism, Buddhism, whatever - even other schools of Vaishnavism - it's this compounded by their hang it all attitude that many people in so many traditions find unnacceptable.
A Buddhist friend once told me that they consider 'Hare Krishnas' to be the Jehovah's Witnesses of the Yoga world ! icon32.gif
Nitaibhangra
Thanks Milla for understanding my point of view .
angrezi
QUOTE
A Buddhist friend once told me that they consider 'Hare Krishnas' to be the Jehovah's Witnesses of the Yoga world
I would concur with that laugh.gif

Not to sound flippant, (as my previous comment might too) but I have witnessed in myself and other ex-IGM that we tend to hold onto our institutional theocratic mentality when exploring our spirituality. We take our 'faith' and place it here or there like a poker chip on a roulette board, with this god or that god (or goddess) this institution or that, and assume that our assumptions of faith represent who we are or what or whom God is. In fact it is existentially frightening on some level to think otherwise.
I am speaking with myself in mind here in particular.

But something deeper tells me this is a very superficial approach. I'm not trying to advocate J. Krishnamurty here but it is intresting to apply his approach to those in our situations. Why not be nothing for a while and simply observe ourselves? Observe what we need, expect and desire from our beliefs. How they tend to both inspire and bind us, locking us into a preconcieved outlook on the mystery (and it is certainly a mystery to us until we attain some direct realization, no matter how much we think we know or profess) of the God and the universe. Does our 'belief' in Shaivam or Vaisnavam (or whatever else) liberate us, or do we just use their respective ideas and philosophy to build more walls between ourselves and who we really are and who or what IS that mysterious transcendental force that underlies all existence? Interesting point to ponder...
Adrija
Yes Angrezi - I found that reading Krishnamurti was very helpful to me in the gradual transition from Vaishnavism to where I am now - I still read him occasionally, and find his teachings on the Other, and his insistence on compassion and love to be harmonious with my own outlook. balloons.gif

p.s. I should also add that I don't think Krishnamurti was as without influence as he claimed.
Chanahari
QUOTE (Adrija @ Oct 2 2005, 03:39 PM)
Chanahari  - am I the person you are referring to who was unpleasant ? - I certainly didn't intend to be.

*


No. I (think that I) know whom Nitaicandra felt being unpleasant towards him - and if I'm not wrong, he wasn't you (although I don't want to publicly mention the person, so as not to enflamme things again). Sorry for the confusion. FLOWERS.GIF
Nitaibhangra
QUOTE (madhavadasa @ Oct 1 2005, 10:38 PM)
Great! Violence and wisdom combined in a story.  biggrin.gif
*


Some similar stories , like the Mahabharata and the Ramayana have been released as movies by some indian film directors .

I wonder if some episodes like this battle have also been released as movies .

However , the majority of the indian movies reseased in the western countries are the sentimental bollywood-amourous-movies , full of kitch ...
babu
gaudiya repercussions, where the battles are so bitter because the stakes are so pathetically small
evakurvan
QUOTE
A Buddhist friend once told me that they consider 'Hare Krishnas' to be the Jehovah's Witnesses of the Yoga world.


I would say this is pretty much how most Buddhists and even fellow Hinduists view Hare Krishnas and coming from that other world, this is how I approached it myself. But joke's on me, who could have thought there to be so much magic in the chanting of some silly cult.
angrezi
QUOTE (babu @ Oct 2 2005, 05:13 PM)
gaudiya repercussions, where the battles are so bitter because the stakes are so pathetically small
*
Amen! rolfmao.gif
evakurvan
Some would say that debating over who is greater shiva or krishna as petty as it seems in the end is no pettier or more profound than debating high-stakes complicated abstract metaphysical assertions.
babu
eva, that's cool you can keep your perspective... for a while a ways back, i thought you were going to shave up
evakurvan
that goes to show how much you know i am completely bald like an eagle.

viking.gif joint.gif mf_pope.gif -> sometimes i wear cool hats to hide it.
babu
Yes, its very important for the women to keep their heads covered.
Pentagram
QUOTE (angrezi @ Oct 2 2005, 12:56 AM)
No. We're all in maya so this is insignificant katha.  biggrin.gif .... The rivalry between the gods is at least 1500 years old. It's kind of cute people, mostly westerners, still get into it smile.gif


Surely the concept of Maya only appeals to ISKCON, and this concept is used to give people a sense of purpose and validity through false superiority?

It's also illusion to beleive a child is abused because of it's karma, a beleif that I cannot ever hold, and had to leave devotees suggeesting this before I smacked him one.

Personally I don't beleive in the concept of universal illusion. It's dangerous.
harendrakottyam
Please enjoy also the prayers of the poor humiliated Shiva , when he lowers his head before Krishna and admits his insignificance before him ...

The above is a quote form Shri Nitaicandra from his post
Krishna defeats Shiva in battle

My learned friend thinks by one enjoying this version of this story, he has scored a victory. However he does have a good knowlege of the scriptures.

First of all I wish to state, this is precisely the reason; I had earlier suggested that book knowledge alone is not sufficient. This does not mean that book knowledge is not important, it is, but the correct interpretation is important.

Let me give a small example, Film star Leonardo DiCaprio & his supermodel girlfriend Gisele Bündchen once went deep into the Amazon forest to live with the natives there.

The natives there were untouched by civilization, living in remote areas in a very what would be described in modern terms as primitive manner.

Finally when these Amazon natives were asked what they felt of Leonardo DiCaprio & his supermodel girlfriend Gisele,? their reply was, they found them very ugly.

Therefore from their point of view they were right.

Now regarding Hindu scriptures there is a lot of contradictions in several places.

Depending of which version you read, that version will state the superiority of that particular deity over all other deities.

One example would be the Srimad Devi Bhagawatan which glorifies the female deities superior over all other deities.

Another would be the Brahama temple in South India, despite the fact, that Lord brahama is not supposed to be worshipped.

There is no reference to worship of idols in the Vedas.

Therefore each sect thinks theirs is the correct one, which is correct from their point of you. BUT THIS DOES NOT MEAN THE OTHER SECT IS WRONG.

In the Siva Purana there is also the story of the defeat of Vishnu who took the form of the man lion Nrsimha at the hands of Virabhadra the furious form of Siva.

When Nrsimha was defeated by Virabhadra he prayed to Lord Siva

“ Oh Lord (Siva) whenever my mind becomes defiled by arrogance it shall be removed by you alone”

Lord Siva then appeared in his true form and said
“ Just as water poured into water, milk poured into milk ,or ghee poured into ghee becomes one with those things, so also Vishnu is merged into Siva, not otherwise.”

“He (Vishnu) shall be prayed an bowed by my devotees aspiring achievements. He is the foremost of my devotees and the granter of boons.”

Then there is the story where Lord Krishna advised the Pandavas to worship lord Shiva (while they were exiled in the forest) , but they neglected that advice. As a result their sufferings increased in magnitude.
Lord Vishnu’s weapon Sudarsana chakra was bestowed unto him by Lord Siva.

This story of Asura Bana, has a different version in the Siva Purana.
It is too long so I will make it short. I have enclosed the relevant scans of portions of this story.

The Asura Bana had pleased Lord Siva by performing the Tandava dance. By adverse faith he became haughty. He had 1000 hands. He asked Lord Siva “wherein his hands may be shattered by an enemy.”

Lord Siva granted this request of Bana.

When the battle started, Lord Krishna’s comrades were defeated.

Lord Krishna restored to Lord Siva and sang a hymn in his reverence ( enclosed scans of Lord Krishna’s hymn).

Lord Siva, was pleased with this hymn and replied that it was due to HIS bidding that Lord Krishna had come there to cut off Bana’s hands.

However Lord Siva added that how could there be the chopping of Bana’s hands while he was watching?

Therefore it was Lord Siva who asked Lord Krishna to make him benumbed by means of Krishna’s Jrmbhana missile.

To make a long story short, Lord Krishna then followed Lord Siva’s instructions and discharged his Jrmbhana missile.

After which I quote the Siva Purana “ When Siva sportively lay flat on the on the ground along with his sons and Ganas. Bana the King of Daityas came out to fight with Krishna” unquote.

Lord Krishna then followed Lord Siva’s instructions and cut of Bana’s hands, leaving four hands.
Bana felt no pain due to Lord Siva’s grace.

Finally, Bana attained the immortality of eternal time and became one of the attendants (Gana) of Lord Siva.

Siva is the preceptor of the preceptors and who sports about always in the middle of the world.

Lord Siva has said in the Siva Purana

“If a devotee of Vishnu hates me or if a devotee of Siva hates Vishnu, both will incur curses and never realize reality”.

I personally also pray to Lord Vishnu and his divine consort Goddess Laxmi,
angrezi
QUOTE (Pentagram @ Oct 3 2005, 04:09 AM)
QUOTE (angrezi @ Oct 2 2005, 12:56 AM)
No. We're all in maya so this is insignificant katha.  biggrin.gif .... The rivalry between the gods is at least 1500 years old. It's kind of cute people, mostly westerners, still get into it smile.gif


Surely the concept of Maya only appeals to ISKCON, and this concept is used to give people a sense of purpose and validity through false superiority?

It's also illusion to beleive a child is abused because of it's karma, a beleif that I cannot ever hold, and had to leave devotees suggeesting this before I smacked him one.

Personally I don't beleive in the concept of universal illusion. It's dangerous.
*

yes, I did not mean for this statement to be taken seriously but to illustrate the points that you describe. I would however go at it from a different route and say this twisted concept of maya also arises from themes of guilt and sin perhaps rooted in Judeao-christian themes most western 'devotees' grew up in or were influenced by.

Guilt and lack of self-empowerment also serve to make a congregation or disciple easy to control by the unscroupulous....

I do however believe from my own experience that I have rather shallow perceptions into the metaphysical realm that comes up often for discussion in religious envirnments, and I can call this 'maya' or 'ignorance' or 'karma' or simply lack of experience. I don't think it is any lack on my part, just as an infant can't walk immediately, and it's not because he is in maya or ignorant. balloons.gif
cool.gif
babu
QUOTE (harendrakottyam @ Oct 3 2005, 06:58 AM)
Please enjoy also the prayers of the poor humiliated Shiva , when he lowers his head before Krishna and admits his insignificance before him ...
*


the meek shall inherit the earth... by his prayers alone, Shiva has displayed his supremacy
babu
QUOTE (babu @ Oct 2 2005, 08:59 PM)
Yes, its very important for the women to keep their heads covered.
*



so the men can make spiritual advancement
evakurvan
I think a better idea is to walk around in fitted garbage bags to camouflage curvatures, it would be like a triple threat. Fashion wise it is like back-alley-chic, religion wise it is like attaining the highest possible sadhana for a female (i.e. to faciliate the male's), and statement-wise: what could be a louder shout out to anti-consumerism and recycling than that! So what do you say girl? I'm game if you are.
babu
krishna and shiva seem to pretty evenly matched... sometimes shiva wins and sometimes krishna wins... i guess it comes down to to whoever is having a better day wins
Kalisurfer
People kill each other while arguing whose soccer team is the best, so it is no surprise that spiritual fundamentalist would go to war over who has the superior God.

I like them both, Krishna and Shiva. They have these persona’s that exude opposing characteristics. One is the clean cut muscular athlete type who rides sports cars while listening to the latest pop music, while the other wears leather jackets, rides motorcycles, smokes cigarettes and listens to wicked hard core music! It’s like being a Beach Boys fan versus a Rolling Stones fan, or being Pat Boone fan instead of Little Richard, or liking Justin Timberlake instead of Eminem!

It’s a personal preference to many, while others could care less and listen to Jazz, Classical, Folk, Techno or just simple Progressive Silence.
Pentagram
QUOTE (angrezi @ Oct 3 2005, 10:13 PM)
QUOTE (Pentagram @ Oct 3 2005, 04:09 AM)
QUOTE (angrezi @ Oct 2 2005, 12:56 AM)
No. We're all in maya so this is insignificant katha.  biggrin.gif .... The rivalry between the gods is at least 1500 years old. It's kind of cute people, mostly westerners, still get into it smile.gif


Surely the concept of Maya only appeals to ISKCON, and this concept is used to give people a sense of purpose and validity through false superiority?

It's also illusion to beleive a child is abused because of it's karma, a beleif that I cannot ever hold, and had to leave devotees suggeesting this before I smacked him one.

Personally I don't beleive in the concept of universal illusion. It's dangerous.
*

yes, I did not mean for this statement to be taken seriously but to illustrate the points that you describe. I would however go at it from a different route and say this twisted concept of maya also arises from themes of guilt and sin perhaps rooted in Judeao-christian themes most western 'devotees' grew up in or were influenced by.

balloons.gif
cool.gif
*



Hi, one thing I have learnt about myself since reading and making postings is how ready I am to fly off about things I perceive to be ISKCON thinking. And that isn't quite fair, I can get as irate with other religious fanatics, in fact most people who are closeted with their thinking, and their feelings of superiority over others. Probably comes from growing up with a narrow minded, bigoted racist stepfather, and probably lots of other things too.

So I will read through postings and think about them more, thanks for that.
harendrakottyam
QUOTE (babu @ Oct 4 2005, 02:48 AM)
QUOTE (harendrakottyam @ Oct 3 2005, 06:58 AM)
Please enjoy also the prayers of the poor humiliated Shiva , when he lowers his head before Krishna and admits his insignificance before him ...
*


the meek shall inherit the earth... by his prayers alone, Shiva has displayed his supremacy
*




the above quote is of The above is a quote form Shri Nitaicandra from his post
Krishna defeats Shiva in battle

It is not my quote. I had just responded to this quote.
babu
QUOTE (harendrakottyam @ Oct 4 2005, 08:38 AM)
QUOTE (babu @ Oct 4 2005, 02:48 AM)
QUOTE (harendrakottyam @ Oct 3 2005, 06:58 AM)
Please enjoy also the prayers of the poor humiliated Shiva , when he lowers his head before Krishna and admits his insignificance before him ...
*


the meek shall inherit the earth... by his prayers alone, Shiva has displayed his supremacy
*




the above quote is of The above is a quote form Shri Nitaicandra from his post
Krishna defeats Shiva in battle

It is not my quote. I had just responded to this quote.
*



my point is that we have visnu outflanked from both sides
Oneiros
Forget Ziva and ViSNu. Tintin is the real thing!
evakurvan
QUOTE
So what do you say girl? I'm game if you are.

Babu, as a mystic who spans time space and three-dimensional reality I am not surprised to see that you do not rebuke the truth that you are factually in all actuality a g heartbeat.gif rl smilie_flagge22.gif. I think you should forget something as obvious as writing poetry railing against Bush and start protesting for the reclamation of yoni status stirthepot.gif as a liberation from the confines of female monopoly.
Dhyana
QUOTE (evakurvan @ Oct 4 2005, 03:28 PM)
QUOTE
So what do you say girl? I'm game if you are.

Babu, as a mystic who spans time space and three-dimensional reality I am not surprised to see that you do not rebuke the truth that you are factually in all actuality a g heartbeat.gif rl smilie_flagge22.gif. I think you should forget something as obvious as writing poetry railing against Bush and start protesting for the reclamation of yoni status stirthepot.gif as a liberation from the confines of female monopoly.
*


CLAPPING.GIF rolling.gif banana.gif
babu
eva, you were close... i'm a lesbian in a male body
evakurvan
i have never heard that one before.
babu
its a mantra, many times repeated to gain liberation
evakurvan
"If someone accepts a fallen conditioned soul as Vishnu, Bhagavan, or an incarnation, he commits a great offense." Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu continued, "To say nothing of ordinary living entities, even Lord Brahma and Lord Siva cannot be considered on the level of Vishnu or Narayana. If one considers them as such, he is immediately considered an offender and atheist. A person who considers demigods like Brahma and Siva to be on an equal level with Narayana is to be considered an offender, a pashandi" (CC Madhya 25.78-80).

So what do you really make of such comments. Creatively exegete them as exstatic glorifaction? Ignore them as anomalies that were added in later on but not the real words of Caitanya? Accept them and therefore consider anyone who worships any other divinity outside of Vaisnavist Hinduism an atheist offender? What else?
madhavadasa
QUOTE (evakurvan @ Oct 8 2005, 11:17 AM)
"If someone accepts a fallen conditioned soul as Vishnu, Bhagavan, or an incarnation, he commits a great offense." Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu continued, "To say nothing of ordinary living entities, even Lord Brahma and Lord Siva cannot be considered on the level of Vishnu or Narayana. If one considers them as such, he is immediately considered an offender and atheist. A person who considers demigods like Brahma and Siva to be on an equal level with Narayana is to be considered an offender, a pashandi" (CC Madhya 25.78-80).

So what do you really make of such comments. Creatively exegete them as exstatic glorifaction? Ignore them as anomalies that were added in later on but not the real words of Caitanya? Accept them and therefore consider anyone who worships any other divinity outside of Vaisnavist Hinduism an atheist offender? What else?
*



It is amazing that the author of Caitanya-caritamrita promoted the baddha jiva Visvambhara Misra as an incarnation of Vishnu and thus committed a great offense! He should therefore be considered an offender and atheist according to his Guru Chaitanya?
Nitaibhangra
QUOTE
** In the Atharva Veda, the Supreme Person says:

itotham krta sannyaso'vatarisyami sa-guno nirvedo
niskamo bhu-girvanas tira-atho' lakanandayah kalau
catuh-sahasrabdhopari panca-sahasrabhyantare
gaura-varno dirghangah sarva-laksana-yukta isvara
prarthito nija-rasasvado bhakta-rupo misrakhyo
vidita-yogah syam

I will descend on the earth after the passage of four thousand years in the Kali-Age, [kalau chatuh sahasrabdhopari] and before the passage of five thousand years [pancha sahasra abhyantare].

I will come on the earth on the bank of the Ganges, [tira-sthah alakanandayah]. I will be a tall and saintly Brahmana devotee. I will have all the auspicious symptoms of an exalted person [dirghangah sarva-laksana-yuktah].

I will exhibit renunciation. I will have all auspicious signs. I will be a devotee, practicing bhakti yoga. I will taste the rasa of My own devotional service.

** In the Sama Veda, the Supreme Lord says:

tathaham krta sannyaso bhu-girvano 'vatarisye
tire'lakanandayah punah punah isvara-prarthitah sa-
parivaro niralambo nirdhuteh kali-kalmasa-kavalita-
janavalambanaya

I shall come to the earth, accompanied by My associates, in a place by the bank of the Ganges. I will advent to save the people who are afflicted and devoured by the sins of the age of Kali. I will manifest as an Avadhut Brahman Sannyasi.

** In the Adi-Puran and in the Narada Puran, the Supreme Person says: 

aham eva dvija-srestho
nityam pracchanna-vigrahah
bhagavad-bhakta-rupena
lokam raksami sarvada

I shall advent in the form of a Brahmana devotee [aham eva dvija-srestho] and I shall hide my factual identity [prachanna vigrahah]. I shall deliver all the worlds [lokam raksami sarvada].

** In the Upa-Puranas, the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Lord Sri Krishna speaks to Srila Vyasadeva:

aham eva kvacid brahman
sannyasa asramam asritah
hari bhaktim grahayami
kalau papa-hatan naran

O Brahmana, I occasionally take the Sannyas Asram [sannyasa asrama asritah] in an attempt to bring the fallen people of Kali Yuga to take up the path of Bhakti or devotional service to Lord Krishna [hari bhaktim grahayami].

** In the Garuda-Purana, the Supreme Lord says:

aham purno bhavisyami
yuga-sandhyau visesatah
mayapure navadvipe
bhavisyami sachi sutah

I will take birth as the son of Sachi [bhavisyami sachi sutah], in Navadvip-Mayapur [mayapure navadvipe]. I will come in my complete spiritual form in the first part of Kali-Yuga.

** In the Bhavisya-Purana, the Supreme Lord says:

anandasru-kala-roma
harsa-purnam tapo-dhana
sarve mama eva draksyanti
kalau sannyasa-rupinam

O austere sage, you should know that in the age of Kali, everyone will see my transcendental form as a sannyasi [kalau sannyasa rupinam]. I will be exhibiting symptoms of ecstasy like shedding tears of bliss and hairs standing in ecstasy [anandasru-kala-roma-harsa-purnam].
madhavadasa
You can´t take verses out of their context and interpret them like that. tongue.gif
The next avatara is Kalki right? Only the GV cult interprets the vedic verses like that. And I seriously doubt that some of the quoted verses are even in the texts they are said to be in.
There have been so many instances like this before, misinterpretation and falsification.
According to GV, God bangs his head and grinds his face bloody against a wall. Nice! tongue.gif
He also instructed one of his friends to commit suicide just because he talked to a woman. What a loving, compassionate God you have. Congratulations.
evakurvan
QUOTE
He also instructed one of his friends to commit suicide just because he talked to a woman. What a loving, compassionate God you have. Congratulations.


Didn't he also let a woman step on his shoulder and when the other men chastized her for stepping on the shoulder of a monk he was all like: You people be quiet! Let her step on my shoulder and don't you dare disturb her!

QUOTE
According to GV, God bangs his head and grinds his face bloody against a wall. Nice!


Just like my signature says! That is the strangest best part and you know it!
madhavadasa
QUOTE (evakurvan @ Oct 13 2005, 10:44 AM)
QUOTE
He also instructed one of his friends to commit suicide just because he talked to a woman. What a loving, compassionate God you have. Congratulations.


Didn't he also let a woman step on his shoulder and when the other men chastized her for stepping on the shoulder of a monk he was all like: You people be quiet! Let her step on my shoulder and don't you dare disturb her!

QUOTE
According to GV, God bangs his head and grinds his face bloody against a wall. Nice!


Just like my signature says! That is the strangest best part and you know it!
*



Ok, so "He" is also confused? Sometimes "He" instructs friends to commit suicide and other times "He" lets women step on his shoulder.
Isn´t GOD beyond this kind of petty behaviour? Always loving, forgiving, the most merciful....?
Chanahari
QUOTE (madhavadasa)
Always loving, forgiving, the most merciful....?


I suppose that there aren't any instances in those shastras accepted by Sri Vaishnavas when God behaves cruelly - so there is no varnashrama-dharma, no Manu-samhita, no overemphasizing austerities in the accepted books, I guess. Am I right? smile.gif
madhavadasa
Narasingha tore out Hiranyakashipu´s intestines etc, but that wasn´t cruel at all.
Nitaibhangra
Now , we´re getting finally back to the original topic of puranic battles . fencing.gif
la dique
Quoted ages ago by evakurvan: "A person who considers demigods like Brahma and Siva to be on an equal level with Narayana is to be considered an offender, a pashandi" (CC Madhya 25.78-80).
First of all, it's dubious that Caitanya used word 'demigod'. It seems to be ACBSwami's way of translating "deva". However the word in original texts refers both to residents of Svarga and Mahapurusha Bhagavan - be it Vishnu or Shiva.
Second of all, "is to be considered" by whom? By Caitanya Mahaprabhu, Vaishnavas of all schools, by pundits from other post-vedic traditions? In the realm of sanatana-dharma they had no popes who would set the absolute rules about anything.
In the end it all would boil down to faith and faith only, because from śruti and smrti one can derive that Absolute is nirguna Brahman, Siva, Vishnu, Mahadevi or even Caitanya Mahaprabhu.
It seems that Hindu people, historically, decided to leave decision to individuals and not fight over it.
Then we've got ISKCON, which vigorously tried to put Mahaprabhu above all.
What could be hardly accepted even in West Bengal or Orissa was to become a worldwide religion
and only interpretation of "vedic" tradition. No surprize that only Westerners had no problem with that.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2013 Invision Power Services, Inc.